(Click
on underlined
link to go to
subject)
- Contents
Chapter
1. Vision System Design
Chapter 2.
Biological Eye
Designs
Chapter 3. Eye
Design Illustrations
Chapter 4. Eye
Reproduction
Chapter 5. Optical
Systems Design
Chapter
6. The
Eye Designer
Related Links
Appendix A --
CRIS Speech & SlideShow by Curt
Deckert
Appendix B - RAPID Speech by Curt Deckert
Appendix C - Comments From Our Readers
Appendix D -
Panicked Evolutionists: The Stephen Meyer Controversy
|
EYE DESIGN BOOK
Chapter
6
Section B
-
Prev
Page
Go to Chapter
Links -
Next Page -
(Click on PICTURE IN TEXT
to bring up LARGE PICTURE)
6. THE EYE DESIGNER
B. Eye
integration design evidence
1. Eye
integration with brain
Human eyes are just one example of very creative
optical system design. All of natures eyes illustrate the result of applying
intelligent design to achieve vision. . If you believe that the white fly
or any animal was created, then it follows that everything else was created
The eye's integration with the brain and the remainder of the body requires
thousands of communication lines connecting each of many types of cells
to function as a vision system. Some nerve cells may have more than 10,000
lines of communication with other cells! The size of these communication
fibers or small tubes may be less than .010 micron in diameter. Such fibers
are even smaller than we can see with most conventional microscopes where,
under ideal conditions, we may be able to see 0.2- micron details. Special
UV microscope systems may enable one to see detail smaller than 0.1 micron
and UV laser scanning microscopes can allow resolution on the order of
.02 micron. UV is used to excite fluorescence to selectively make many
active lines of communication between cells visible. If this advanced cell
integration and communication evidence had been known in 1850, it is probable
that most educated people would not pay much attention to present evolutionary
theories. It would seem that today, having well over 1000 times the technical
knowledge available in 1850, we should have more objective ideas about
the origin of vision. I doubt that Darwin would go along with his followers
of today.
2. Eye integration with other
parts of body
Eyes, larger in proportion to body size, are
more difficult to integrate into a creature in terms of weight, volume,
brain size requirements, and the overall need for energy. Ideally, larger
eyes and brains have the ability to process and store more data. Smaller
eyes provide input for difficult high-speed image processing, but smaller
brains probably have less long-term memory and learning abilities.
Eyes are typically well integrated with the
remainder of the animal. One of the prime examples of eye camouflage is
the visual design on many eyes. Here the microscopic anti-reflective coating
on moth eyes shows very definite design effort. In some animals,
eyes that protrude will reduce the camouflage capability, hinder flying,
or slow swimming. Other animals need eyes that protrude, in order to provide
a means of wide angle scanning with eyes having a limited field of view.
See the following Figure for animals having a variety of
eye mountings.(Fig 6.14b from pg. 152, Iridology, Vol. 2, 1982, published
by Bernard Jensen Enterprises, Escondido, CA 92027) (Fig 6.14b adapted from 1999
Eye Poster from Anatomical Chart Co. Skokie, IL)
|
Figure 6-14a Variety
of Eye Mountings
Figure 6-14b Human
Eye Mounting
|
There is considerable parallel processing in natures
eyes, as compared to most man-made vision systems that have been devised
recently using very fast serial processing. Serial processing used in machine
vision requires less complex interfacing, but is limited for rapid pattern
recognition because of the speed of the interface. This compares to natures small
eyes that transmit information over many parallel paths to small efficient brains
for split second response. This requires more integration effort on the
part of a designer.
Another example of intelligent design is the
complexity of the eye iris integration to control light input to the retina.
For example, in humans the variation in the iris edge pattern showing in
the eyes is used by some to identify a person or even to detect diseases
in many parts of the body. Linking of the iris pattern with major parts
of the body is certainly evidence of very creative integrated design. This
makes the iris of both eyes operate as visual health indicators. Iridology
analysis (study of the iris color and patterns of its parts) is controversial,
but it appears that there may be some basis for this alternate means of
medical analysis for those schooled in this art (or science). If this is
true, our bodies are certainly more complex than most people realize. This
may mean that considerable visual health information is furnished to those
willing and able to analyze it.
This type of analysis is illustrated by
the following two figures: (Adapted from page 228, Iridology, Vol.
2, 1982, Bernard Jensen, Publisher) |
Figure 6-15 Iris
Health Diagram Model
for Right Eye
Figure 6--16 Iris
Health Diagram Model
for Left Eye
|
Please see Iridology reference for correct horizontal
and vertical orientation of both charts. These figures are presented
for educational purposes only, Our research in this area is not comclusive.
3.
Integrated vision growth
DNA programs cells before birth to generate
specific materials for eyes as growth takes place. Plants, animals, insects,
humans, air, water, and land are all interrelated, with programmed information
that appears to have come from specific designs. The usefulness of vision
to many body functions and activities is apparent to all of us. This is
especially evident as we learn how optic system cells grow, along with
communication and brain cells, to make up useful integrated vision systems.
There is certainly evidence of intelligent programming in the precise way
reproduction is orchestrated in the many different types of eye cells.
Many cell messages for vision systems must be coordinated within the brain
of each type of creature.
Growth of eye cells requires complex molecules,
such as DNA and RNA. DNA stores genetic information, which is in effect
a design blueprint for cells. RNA molecules transport the correct blueprint
information to the correct cell building site made up of complex proteins.
Eye cells cannot function without RNA and DNA. New eye cell generation
requires that all these functions be in place. Some scientists say that
originally RNA could function alone, but this is highly unlikely with early
earth high temperatures. Accurate cell production is required to preserve
the long- term functions of the RNA. Focused overall design effort was
necessary for overall cell location, integration and communication to take
place.
4. Embedded programming of automatic
vision functions The interaction
and construction of RNA and DNA molecules in cells play key roles in the
reproduction of eyes. It is expected that significant knowledge is stored
in cells and in well-designed databases within the brain. The variability
and constraints of the DNA code provide a framework indicating a well-planned
reproducible design. The programmed reproduction of eye cells should be
evidence enough for proving intelligent design.
The vision systems of insects, animals, and
humans all integrate programmed or automatic eye functions and learned
responses. For example, programming for gathering and saving food from
one season to another depends on eyes for key inputs and the brain for
overall control of the vision system. Spiders need to have enough intelligence
and visual resolution to build webs, trap food, and to recognize danger.
Control functions and programming involving some type of intelligent reference
is also necessary to interpret environmental changes such as temperature,
seasons, light, and darkness for all kind of creatures.
It appears certain instincts involve programming
of vision functions. These occurred in all of creation and each species
of animal, each with a specific eye design having different DNA programming.
Built-in intelligence is required for whales, geese, butterflies and other
creatures that travel long distances. Here intelligence for viewing stars,
days, nights and other references is required for navigation. This requires
integration of the eyes with a brain containing initial control information
and the ability to learn all they need to know by communication with other
creatures. All of this is required for vision in all sizes of animals.
Even small butterflies, having long migration paths, must have some embedded
or programmed information. For example, Monarch butterflies, having never
made the trip before, must have some information or when and where to start.
When we look at the huge database of optical information necessary to describe
eye optics and vision for all existing creatures, we can easily become
overwhelmed. It may help to visualize our vision system like a computer
system, where the program is the key element in coordinating and
reasoning.
Where did eye
software design come from?
How did such elegant
eye designs develop over such a short period of time?
5. Using vision integration
technology to control animals as robots
The overall cost is high for developing man-made,
non-reproducing vision systems similar to those found in small, medium,
and large animals. This increases the possibility of using vision integration
technology by training animals and/or insects. There is also the possibility
of replacing or supplementing very small robotic systems instead of building
complete robots. Big animals, such as elephants or horses, are already
used on a large scale for work all over the world. We should be able to
control very small living creatures, much like dogs are trained to aid
the blind. Since they have less apparent reasoning power to resist training
it would seem to be feasible.
For example, if communication methods are developed to
utilize insects, they can be trained to go into places which larger animals cannot
go. Work has started in this area with the remote control of cockroaches carrying
special surveillance packages. If their vision and control systems could
be manipulated and monitored, insects could be used for weapons of war
against physical targets, for carrying out selective medical surgery by
cleaning wounds and removing specific tissue, and for other limited access
applications. As we learn to communicate with insects and other small animals
such as leeches and gain access to their vision and recognition systems,
we may learn to monitor their vision and control them with respect to what
they see.
There are many potential robotic and instrumentation
applications for very small insect type eyes if we can learn more about
these small vision systems. Here, insects could be great caregivers, in
that they could gather tissue samples or deliver drugs to specific sites,
sense the need for medication, and provide a means of monitoring hard-to-reach
organs.
|
|